State Ex Rel. Panesko v. Public Utility District No. 1
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Driver, J. —
This action, in the nature of quo warranto, was brought to test the validity of public utility district No. 1 of Lewis county. A trial to the court resulted in findings and judgment declaring the district to be “a municipal corporation duly and regularly organized pursuant to” the public utility district act, Laws of 1931, chapter 1, p. 3 (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 11605 [P. C. § 4498-11] et seq.). Plaintiff appealed.
The act provides for two types of districts. One, coextensive with the limits of the county, may be organized as follows:
“At any general election the board of county…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Royer v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Adams v. Local No. 400 of Cooks & HelpersWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Bremerton v. Bremerton Water & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Hillier v. Public Utility District No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Langert v. DavidWashington Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2002
- Gamble v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022