Legal Opinion
Hillier v. Public Utility District No. 3
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1936No. 26249. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
—Tbis appeal is from a decree of tbe superior court enjoining tbe appellants, officers of public utility district No. 3, Mason county, from levying, and tbe county treasurer (ex-officio assessor) from spreading upon tbe tax rolls, taxes for utility district purposes for tbe year 1936.
The questions raised call for the construction of certain provisions of the Grange power act, so called, adopted by the electors at the 1930 general election. Chapter 1, Laws of 1931, p. 3 (Bern. Bev. Stat., § 11605 [P. C. §4498-11] et seq.).
By § 3 of the act (Bern. Bev. Stat., § 11607 [P. C. §4498-13]), two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Royer v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Superior Court for Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Allen v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Panesko v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2002
- Allen v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.