Legal Opinion

Borough of Neptune City v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 24, 1972PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Hall, J.

The question presented by this case is whether an oceanfront municipality may charge non-residents higher fees than residents for the use of its beach area. The Law Division sustained an amendatory ordinance of defendant *299Borough of Avon-by-the-Sea (Avon) so providing. 114 N. J. Super. 115 (1971). The challenge came from plaintiffs Borough of Neptune City, an adjacent inland municipality, and two of its residents. We granted plaintiffs’ motion to certify their appeal to the Appellate Division before argument in that tribunal. R. 2:12-2. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hoboken v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Air Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lansco, Inc v. Dept. of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Salorio v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API