Legal Opinion
United States v. Yeaman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1997No. 2:96-cv-00003PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are defendant David Rex Yeaman’s Motion to Strike Language, and the government’s response thereto, and Yeaman’s reply thereto, and the parties’ supplemental memoranda thereto. For the following reasons, this Court will deny Yeaman’s motion to strike language.
I. Introduction
The indictment charges defendant David Rex Yeaman and his co-defendants with having conspired to manipulate the prices of five stocks and then leasing those stocks to offshore reinsurance companies for inclusion on their balance sheets as inflated assets. 1…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Richman v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. Darin L. HedgepethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. El-SilimyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.