People v. Dadou
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in its response to the jury’s request for supplemental instructions on the "criteria” for the crimes charged. The court responded meaningfully to the inquiry by providing the elements of the crimes under consideration without repeating its instructions on the justification defense (see, People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 131-132; see also, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, 302, cert denied 459 US 847).
We find no error in County Court’s denial of the motion to suppress defendant’s statement to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999