Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 2006Published

1Dissent

Scudder and Kehoe, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent, because we cannot agree with the majority that reversal is required based on Supreme Court’s alleged errors in failing to read into the record the jury’s first and second notes, as required by People v O'Rama (78 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1991]), and in failing to respond meaningfully to the jury’s first note (see generally People v Steinberg, 79 NY2d 673, 684 [1992]; People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 131-132 [1984]; People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, 301-302 [1982], cert denied 459 US 847 [1982]). Although we agree with defendant and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API