Legal Opinion

Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Boyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1900No. 11,592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; W. G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J.:

This was an action on a policy of life insurance. The insurance was taken on the life of Mrs. Clara A. Boyer in favor of her husband Harry E. Boyer. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant company has prosecuted error to this court. Before pleading to the merits the insurance company made a motion to set aside the service on it because of lack of jurisdiction in the court to compel it to respond to the summons issued against it. This motion was overruled. It *32then filed a plea in abatement to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Gibbs v. . Queen Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Shearer v. Farmers Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Magoffin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Toedman v. Nooter CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API