Legal Opinion

Toedman v. Nooter Corporation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1957No. 40,220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.:

This action was brought by the Director of Revenue of the State Commission of Revenue and Taxation to collect staté use taxes assessed by the Commission against the Nooter Corporation, a foreign corporation, not authorized to do business in this state. The trial court sustained a motion of defendant corporation to quash the service of summons. The director has appealed. Service was attempted pursuant to G. S. 1949, 17-509. It provides in part as follows:

“In tlie event of any foreign corporation doing business within the state of Kansas, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Woodring v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Curtis Publishing Company, a Corporation v. Louis CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Conn v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. BBP Association, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. Houdry Process Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API