Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Challiss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1902No. 12,958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; ~W. T. Bland, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.:

This action was brought by the county board of Atchison county against Mary A. Challiss, the owner of a city lot in Atchison, her husband, and all parties in interest in such lot, under the provisions of chapter 392, Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§7718-7724), to obtain a determination of the amount of unpaid taxes existing against said lot, to have the amount so determined decreed a first lien thereon, and an order of sale in satisfaction thereof.

At the date of the commencement of the action Mary A. Challiss and her husband were citizens…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Dunkle v. ElstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Reyburn v. BrackettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. AldenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Threadgill v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Thisler v. LittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. BenefielSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API