Legal Opinion

People v. Commercial Alliance Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the claimant, Nahum Tozier, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of May, 1896, overruling his exceptions to the report of a referee and confirming said report.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The referee, appointed to pass upon and determine the validity of claims against the receiver of the defendant corporation, reported to the court that the claim presented by Nahum Tozier was not enforcible, and the receiver properly rejected it. That claim, was based upon a judgment alleged to have been recovered against the Commercial AllianceTnsurance Company in the Supreme Court of the State of Maine on the 6th day of October, 1894. The claimant introduced in evidence, before the referee, an. exemplified copy of a judgment roll entered in the Supreme Court of Maine, in which,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. . Queen Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown-Ketcham Iron Works v. George B. Swift Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Meixell v. American Motor Car Sales Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Sivertsen v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
  5. Millan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API