Legal Opinion

Cordero v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1983No. 80-594PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

The principal question in this case is whether the trial court erroneously refused to raise certain matters during voir dire of the jury panel. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by failing either (1) to outline the facts alleged, followed by a specific inquiry as to whether the prospec*839tive jurors felt any prejudice toward appellant because of his political views or affiliations, or at least (2) to alert the prospective jurors to the political issues involved and then to inquire, more generally, whether they could be impartial. We therefore reverse…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Fisher v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API