Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 2008No. 99-CF-1460, 05-CO-1228PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITZ, Associate Judge:
A Superior Court jury found appellant David Jackson guilty of aggravated assault while armed and assault with a dangerous weapon for beating his estranged wife with a hammer. The trial court imposed consecutive prison sentences for the two convictions, including a life term for aggravated assault while armed, and later denied appellant’s motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (2001). In these consolidated appeals, appellant argues principally (1) that the evidence of “serious bodily injury” presented at trial was insufficient as a matter of law…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Nero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Collins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.