Legal Opinion

York v. George

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1944No. Appeal, 139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued the Pittsburgh Railways Company and Albert Romstock to recover for injuries received in a collision between the Railways Company’s car and Romstock’s automobile in which she was a passenger. The jury found in her favor against Romstock in the sum of $20,000.00 and in favor of the Railways Company. Both the plaintiff and the defendant, Romstock, moved for new trial and, after hearing, both motions were refused. Judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor on her verdict against Romstock, and against her on the verdict in favor of the Railways Company.

The docket entries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Dormont Motors, Inc. for Use v. HoerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Bekelja v. James E. Strates Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Estate of Gasbarini v. Medical Center of Beaver County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Cardwell v. Chrysler Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Del Boring Tire Service, Inc. v. Barr MacHine, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API