Cardwell v. Chrysler Financial Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 This appeal stems from the order entering summary judgment in favor of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company on April 9, 2001, in the Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County. The trial court found that coverage under the policy was not available to either the insured or Chrysler Financial Corporation as the lien-holder and that Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This appeal involves the interpretation of an automobile insurance policy and the determination of whether the lienholder can recover under that policy. For the following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Albright v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WickettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- AIG Centennial Insurance Company v. J. Brian O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Enright v. KirkendallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Franklin Insurance Co. v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- AIG Centennial Insurance Company v. J. Brian O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.