Dormont Motors, Inc. for Use v. Hoerr
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an appeal from an order opening a judgment entered on a verdict of a jury and granting a new trial where the application for relief was not made by the defendant until after two terms had expired following the entry of the judgment. We are of the opinion that under the facts shown the judgment should not have been disturbed.
The action is replevin and was brought to recover possession of an automobile claimed by the plaintiff. The writ issued after a bond was given by the plaintiff and was served by the sheriff who took possession of the automobile and delivered it…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haverford Township School District v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Fisher v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Pennsylvania Stave Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Norris v. CroweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Hambleton v. YocumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Simpson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Great American Credit Corp. v. Thomas Mini-Markets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Windber Trust Co. v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- York v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.