Legal Opinion

Jeffery v. Hanson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1952No. 31755PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This appeal and cross-appeal are from a judgment entered, after a trial to the court, in an action for damages for breach of an express warranty.

We will refer to appellants as Pague, to the respondent and cross-appellant as Jeffery, and to the cross-respondents as Crescent. All these parties are dealers in heavy automotive equipment — Jeffery in Penticton, British Columbia, Canada, Crescent and Pague in Everett and Seattle, Washington, respectively.

To establish the facts of this case, we have considered Pague’s attack upon the findings of fact made by the trial court. We are unable to say…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cochran v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dobbin v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Peregrine v. West Seattle State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lian v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Terry Martin v. Stanley SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API