Legal Opinion

Bean v. City of Thousand Oaks

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2025No. B338497Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/29/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX BONNIE BEAN, 2d Civ. No. B338497 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff, 00561100-CU-PO-VTA) (Ventura County) v. CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, Defendant and Appellant; GINA L. GOODE, Defendant and Respondent. When a defendant brings a motion for summary judgment, must a codefendant file a cross-complaint to obtain standing to oppose the motion? (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, 1 subd. (p)(2).) Here we hold that a codefendant with an adverse interest has standing to oppose a motion…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API