Legal Opinion
Anest v. Audino
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 12, 2002No. 2-01-0599PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum
Plaintiff, Bill Anest, sued defendant, David Audino, for breach of a note and enforcement of a guaranty. Audino filed a counterclaim, alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty (count VI) and tortious interference with business expectancy (count VII). The trial court entered judgment for Anest on his claim and awarded him $130,000 in damages, $47,041 in attorney fees, and $1,634 in costs. Audino appeals the award of attorney fees, and we affirm on that issue. On Audino’s counterclaim, Anest moved for a directed finding at the close of Audi-no’s case in chief. The court granted Anest’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory AncelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Graham v. MimmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- E.J. McKernan Co. v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Hagshenas v. GaylordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Baldi v. Lynch (In Re McCook Metals, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Thomas Adams v. Richard Catrambone and Great Lakes Building Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg v. LoffrediAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Krol v. Wilcek (In Re H. King & Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Larson v. Bayer (In re Bayer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.