Legal Opinion

Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg v. Loffredi

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 12, 2003No. 1-02-1006PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

A collection action was brought by plaintiff law firm, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman and Nagelberg (plaintiff), seeking to recover attorney fees and costs for services it rendered on behalf of defendants, Robert and Kevin Loffredi (defendants), in a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD), arbitration proceeding. The circuit court granted summary judgment in plaintiffs favor based on the doctrine of judicial estoppel. Defendants appeal on the ground that the court erred in applying judicial estoppel to the circumstances of this case. The facts set forth below emanate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lindenmier v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gambino v. Boulevard Mortgage Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Bentley Funding v. Sk & R GroupSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Seymour v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. MataIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API