Legal Opinion

Hagshenas v. Gaylord

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1990No. 2-88-0840PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Robert and Virginia Gaylord, and Imperial Travel, Ltd. (Imperial), appeal from the lower court’s determination of damages in their successful suit against Bruce Hagshenas for breach of fiduciary duty. The lower court found that damages were too uncertain and, therefore, ordered an equitable remedy requiring Hagshenas to forfeit his shares of Imperial stock to Imperial and pay court costs. The Gaylords argue that damages were not too uncertain to be awarded. Hagshenas has filed a cross-appeal contesting liability. He contends the court erred in finding he breached a fiduciary duty in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Midland Hotel Corp. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Vendo Company v. StonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Rexford Rand Corporation v. Gregory AncelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Small v. SussmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Doherty v. KahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Giammanco v. GiammancoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API