Mesaba Loan Co. v. Sher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
In each case the plaintiff sues on a promissory note for a loan made pursuant to the plan of lending commonly known as the Morris Plan, authorized by L. 1933, c. 246 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1936 Supp. §§ 7774-25 to 7774-35) under which plaintiffs are organized as industrial loan and thrift companies. The statute [7774-28 (b)] authorizes such companies to engage principally in the business of making small loans “upon the security of co-makers, personal chattels or other property, exclusive of real estate, for a period not to exceed one year; * * *” A certificate of authorization…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bourjois, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.