Legal Opinion

Mesaba Loan Co. v. Sher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1938No. Nos. 31,842, 31,843, 31,888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

In each case the plaintiff sues on a promissory note for a loan made pursuant to the plan of lending commonly known as the Morris Plan, authorized by L. 1933, c. 246 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1936 Supp. §§ 7774-25 to 7774-35) under which plaintiffs are organized as industrial loan and thrift companies. The statute [7774-28 (b)] authorizes such companies to engage principally in the business of making small loans “upon the security of co-makers, personal chattels or other property, exclusive of real estate, for a period not to exceed one year; * * *” A certificate of authorization…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Bourjois, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API