Legal Opinion

Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Harrison

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1937No. 355PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, a stock corporation organized under the laws of Connecticut, carrying on casualty insurance business in Georgia, and its salaried employee W. M. Francis, citizen of that State, asked the Superior Court, Fulton County, for a mandamus requiring the Insurance Commissioner to license him as resident agent. The Commissioner claimed that while duly qualified in all other respects, the employee could not be so licensed because of the inhibition in § 1, Act of the General Assembly, approved March 28, 1935. Georgia Laws, 1935, p. 140:

“No…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API