Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Norman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1964No. 76PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPE, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee, plaintiff below, against appellant, defendant below, after the trial court severed a cross-action filed by appellant against appellee.

By three points appellant contends that the trial court erred, as follows: (1) in severing appellant’s cross-action and docketing same as a separate case, (2) in granting a summary judgment when material issues of fact were allegedly presented, and (3) if summary judgment was proper, in failing to enter an interlocutory judgment in favor of appellee based upon a promissory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Paul v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Pure Oil Company v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Martin v. First Rep. Bank, Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Weaver v. Jock, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1986
  3. Wilson v. City of Port LavacaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Straughan v. Houston Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Angerstein v. AngersteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API