Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 18, 2007No. Court No. 05-00019Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EATON, Judge:

This matter is before the court on the United States’ motion on behalf of defendant the United States Secretary of Agriculture (“defendant” or the “Department”) to dismiss plaintiff Matthew Miller’s action challenging the Department’s denial of his application for trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) for failure to prosecute pursuant to USCIT Rule 41(b)(3). See Def.’s Mot. Dismiss at 1; see also 19 U.S.C. § 2401e (2002). Jurisdiction lies with 19 U.S.C. § 2395(c). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted, and plaintiff’s case is dismissed, without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul Louis Harrelson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. The United States v. Chas. Kurz Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Luu v. U.S. Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. M/V Cheri H. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  5. United States v. RubinsteinUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API