Legal Opinion
United States v. Rubinstein
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 10, 1999No. Slip Op. 99-78; Court 86-07-00935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WATSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action commenced by the United States (the “Government” or “plaintiff’) more than thirteen years ago— on July 23, 1986 — pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592(d) for the recovery of $416,639.26, plus interest. 1 The sum plaintiff seeks to recover represents an alleged loss of customs duties (plus interest) on five entries of various pieces of gold jewelry at the port of Seattle, Washington between September and December 1981, nearly eighteen years ago.
The gravamen of plaintiffs complaint is that David M. Rubinstein and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lynda Peart v. City of New York, New York City Police Department, Raymond Kelly, David DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Consumer Products Division, Scm Corporation, the United States, Party-In-Interest v. Silver Reed America, Inc. And Silver Seiko, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manutoli v. United States Sec'y of Agric.United States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Manutoli v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Miller v. United States Sec'y of Agric.United States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Miller v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- SV Block II v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.