Legal Opinion

Luu v. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 2, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-63; Court 05-00430PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

Plaintiff shrimper brought this action against the U.S. Department of Agriculture to challenge the agency’s denial of his application for benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”) for Farmers program. The matter is before the Court following Plaintiffs failure to respond to an Order to Show Cause why the action should not be dismissed. Jurisdiction lies under 19 U.S.C. § 2395(c) (Supp. II 2002).

Based on Plaintiff s failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause, and in light of the chronology of events in the case to date (detailed more fully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M/V Cheri H. Inc. v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manutoli v. United States Sec'y of Agric.United States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Manutoli v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. Miller v. United States Sec'y of Agric.United States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Miller v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. SV Block II v. United States Secretary of AgricultureUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API