Legal Opinion
Creighton v. Reviczky
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 9, 1985No. B008808PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DANIELSON, J.
Appellants Roger Creighton and others appeal from the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) by which they sought to compel respondent Kathleen Reviczky, City Clerk of the City of Hermosa Beach, to file and process a referendum petition. We affirm the judgment.
Facts
On June 26, 1984, the Hermosa Beach City Council adopted ordinance number 84-751, entitled: “An Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach Which Adopts a Specific Plan to Regulate Development in the Downtown Area Between 15th and 13th Streets and the Strand and Hermosa Avenue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Brosnahan v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Clark v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Myers v. StringhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Chase v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mervyn's v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Billig v. VogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Lin v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.