Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Bierman v. Orthofix International, N.V.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 1, 2015No. Civil Action No. 05-10557-RWZPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RYA W. ZOBEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff-relator Jeffrey J. Bierman brought this qui tam action on behalf of the United States and several state and municipal entities alleging that numerous defendants, including EBI and DJO,1 violated the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729; the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b); and various state and local fraud laws that closely mirror the False Claims Act.2 The allega*417tions all relate to reimbursement claims that the defendants submitted to Medicare for purchases of their bone growth stimulator devices. The federal government…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Cook County v. United States Ex Rel. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Nargol v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  2. State of Hawaii v. Liberty Dialysis-Hawaii LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  3. United States v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API