Legal Opinion

Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1961No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Justice Alpern,

This Court decided in Baur v. Mesta Machine Co., 393 Pa. 380, 143 A. 2d 12 (1958) that when an employer voluntarily provides a first aid room and administers to ill as well as injured employees, it has *619the duty to provide proper medical care. If the employee’s death from coronary occlusion was found to he due to the neglect of the employer in not providing proper medical care, this would constitute an “industrial accident” which is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In reaching this conclusion this Court adopted the arguments advanced by Mesta and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Lorigan v. W. O. Gulbranson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Montgomery v. South Philadelphia Medical Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. City of Philadelphia v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API