Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Justice Alpern,
This Court decided in Baur v. Mesta Machine Co., 393 Pa. 380, 143 A. 2d 12 (1958) that when an employer voluntarily provides a first aid room and administers to ill as well as injured employees, it has *619the duty to provide proper medical care. If the employee’s death from coronary occlusion was found to he due to the neglect of the employer in not providing proper medical care, this would constitute an “industrial accident” which is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. In reaching this conclusion this Court adopted the arguments advanced by Mesta and its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Lorigan v. W. O. Gulbranson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by24 opinions
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Montgomery v. South Philadelphia Medical Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Philadelphia v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.