Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 2, 1999No. AC 17998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CRETELLA, J.

The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his habeas corpus petition. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) improperly dismissed his claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at his criminal trial and (2) failed to apply the correct legal standard when reviewing the petitioner’s claim that his attorney had a conflict of interest during the appeal. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The trial court’s memorandum of decision and the record disclose the following facts and procedural history. Following a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Walton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Quint v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Whyte v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Zollo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API