Legal Opinion
Elsken v. Network Multi-Family Security Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 1992No. 78628PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
We are presented with three questions certified to this Court from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis trict of Oklahoma, pursuant to 20 O.S. §§ 1601 et seq., to wit:
“1. Whether, under Oklahoma law, a contractual limitation of liability for personal injury is valid and enforceable?”, and
“2. Whether, under Oklahoma law, the limitation of liability clause contained in the Residential Alarm Security Agreement is valid and enforceable?”
“3. Whether, under Oklahoma law, the indemnification and hold harmless clause is valid and enforceable.”
We answer question…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- E.H. Ashley & Co., Inc. And Willow Associates v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Fretwell v. Protection Alarm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Mohawk Drilling Company, a Corporation v. McCullough Tool Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Morgan Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Jimmie Elsken, Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Ann Elsken v. Network Multi-Family Security Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Midland Red Oak Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- NMP Corp. v. Parametric Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1997
- Manning v. BrannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.