Morgan Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court granting defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment limiting its liability to $250. We affirm.
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the retail and wholesale jewelry business. In July of 1973 it entered into an agreement with defendant whereby defendant agreed to install and service a central station burglar alarm system at plaintiff’s place of business. In return, plaintiff agreed to pay defendant $605 upon completion of the installation and $82 a month thereafter.
The system was apparently connected by two wires to a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Crum v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Fretwell v. Protection Alarm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Central Alarm of Tucson v. GanemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- General Bargain Center v. American Alarm Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.