Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1996No. 715PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:

This is an appeal from a judgment denying Conduit & Foundation Corporation’s post-verdict motions and entering judgment for Joseph Dougherty in the amount of $250,908.49. We reverse.

Joseph Dougherty instituted a negligence action against Conduit & Foundation Corporation (Conduit) after being injured while performing work for his employer, Ponns & Thomas. Conduit had been hired, as a general contractor, to renovate train tracks and platforms for Amtrak at Philadelphia’s 80th Street Station. Conduit had subcontracted with Ponns & Thomas to perform the painting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Timbrook v. Foremost InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Emery v. Leavesly McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Kelly v. Thackray Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Lascio v. Belcher Roofing Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. O'Donnell v. R.M. Shoemaker & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API