Dougherty v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus:
This is an appeal from a judgment denying Conduit & Foundation Corporation’s post-verdict motions and entering judgment for Joseph Dougherty in the amount of $250,908.49. We reverse.
Joseph Dougherty instituted a negligence action against Conduit & Foundation Corporation (Conduit) after being injured while performing work for his employer, Ponns & Thomas. Conduit had been hired, as a general contractor, to renovate train tracks and platforms for Amtrak at Philadelphia’s 80th Street Station. Conduit had subcontracted with Ponns & Thomas to perform the painting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Timbrook v. Foremost InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Emery v. Leavesly McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Kelly v. Thackray Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lascio v. Belcher Roofing Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- O'Donnell v. R.M. Shoemaker & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.