Legal Opinion

Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1992No. 796PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County in favor of the defendants/appellees. We reverse.

Appellant Roceo Pirozzi (“Pirozzi”) purchased a 1986 Cadillac Eldorado coupe from appellees Penske Olds-CadillacGMC, Inc., Patriot-Oldsmobile-GMC, Inc., and Cowan OldsCadillac-GMC, Inc. (“Penske”) in 1986. 1 The automobile was held out as “new” by Penske; however, unknown to Pirozzi, a surface crease or gouge on the front edge of the left door had been repaired and repainted by Penske before the car was offered for sale. The crease was approximately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Gardner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Kaplan v. Cablevision of PA, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API