Sahm v. State ex rel. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Superior Court of Marion County (75,014) ; Vinson Carter, Judge. Action by The State of Indiana, on the relation of the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Lonis Railway Company, against Cyrus J. Clark, as Auditor of Marion County, and another (Albert Sahm, successor to said Clark, afterward substituted). Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.
Appellee’s relator commenced this action mainly for the purpose of obtaining a mandamus against Cyrus J. Clark, as auditor of Marion county, Indiana, and as an ancillary matter to this action demanded relief by injunction against the treasurer of said county, a coappellant herein, in order, as asserted, to preserve the subject-matter of the controversy between the parties. The complaint is quite long, and refers to and sets out several documents, amounts and many matters in detail. The following appears to be the substance of some of the facts alleged: The relator continuously since 1889 has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Conn v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Jarrell v. BrubakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bronnenberg v. Indiana Union Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Caldwell v. BauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller v. GatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- City of Indianapolis v. Central Amusement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Tom v. TomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940