Legal Opinion

Palm v. General Painting Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 17, 1990No. 23265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Palm v. General Painting Co., Inc., 296 S.C. 41, 370 S.E. (2d) 463 (Ct. App. 1988), in which the facts of the case are fully recited. The Court of Appeals relied upon an exception to the collateral estoppel doctrine set forth in section 29, comment g of the Restatement (Second) of Judgments and held that respondent Christy Palm (Christy) was not precluded by prior family court actions from relitigating the issue of her paternity. We affirm as modified.

Christy was born to Veronica Palm Stewart (Veronica) in 1980…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
  2. South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BacoteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Roberts v. Recovery Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Neely v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API