Legal Opinion
United States v. Padilla
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 1997No. 97 CR. 72(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Defendants Francisco Padilla (“Padilla”), Ramon Torres (“Torres”), and Agripina Fernandez (“Fernandez”) are charged with conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Each defendant moves for an order to suppress physical evidence seized at their respective apartments in the course of arrests conducted on the mornings of August 14,1996 (Padilla) and October 18, 1996 (Torres and Fernandez), and to suppress post-arrest statements. Hearings on these motions were held on June 6, 1997 and July 11, 1997. The defendants also move for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. EchevarriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Hess v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- United States v. FelixDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States v. WickDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
- State v. BrixeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019