Legal Opinion
Hess v. Ryan
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 25, 2009No. CV-06-1639-PHX-PGR (JI)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
Having reviewed de novo the thorough Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Irwin in light of the petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation Dated May 12, 2009 (doc. # 76) and Respondents’ Response to Petitioner’s Objection to Report and Recommendation (doc. # 77) 1 , the Court finds that the petitioner’s objections should be overruled as being without merit and that the Magistrate Judge correctly determined that the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be denied.
The Court…
2Cases cited153 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- (HC) Chatman v. CinerosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- United States v. DeWayne CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010