Legal Opinion
Orleman v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 25, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 23294PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNTON, District Judge.
This is an action to set aside and enjoin enforcement of the decision and or*946ders of the Interstate Commerce Commission which require that plaintiff cease and desist from conducting his business operations until he obtains authority from the Commission to engage in his present business, which has been found by the Commission to be that of a common or contract carrier, or the transportation of property for-hire in interstate commerce. It is the contention of plaintiff that his business is not that of a common or contract carrier, that at most he is a broker and as such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DudgeonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Aaa Con Drivers Exchange, Inc., Irving Zola and Helen Zola, and Aaa Con Drivers Exchange-L. A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Spencer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Professional Driver Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964