Legal Opinion
Spencer v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 22, 1964No. Civ. A. No. C62-422PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER.
This is an action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325, and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1009, for. review of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered in its Docket Nos. MCC-3117, Fred Spencer, d. b, a. A. A. Delivery, Investigation of Operations, and MC-119945, Fred D. Spencer — Common Carrier Application.
By its decision and order in a consolidated proceeding, the Commission found that the operations being conducted by plaintiff constituted for-hire transportation of automobiles in interstate commerce, for which Commission…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DudgeonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Columbia Transportation Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Aaa Con Drivers Exchange, Inc., Irving Zola and Helen Zola, and Aaa Con Drivers Exchange-L. A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Lake Shore Motor Freight Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- Professional Driver Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974