Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 5, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

This action is brought under § 222(b) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended 49 U.S.C. § 322(b), and 49 U.S.C. § 42, to enjoin the two corporate defendants and their officers and agents from engaging in interstate operations on public highways as common carriers by motor vehicle without a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission, which is required under § 206(a) (1) of the Act, as amended 49 U.S.C. § 306(a) (D-

Defendant AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc. has its office and place of business in New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DudgeonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. Studna v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API