Interstate Commerce Commission v. AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
This action is brought under § 222(b) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended 49 U.S.C. § 322(b), and 49 U.S.C. § 42, to enjoin the two corporate defendants and their officers and agents from engaging in interstate operations on public highways as common carriers by motor vehicle without a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission, which is required under § 206(a) (1) of the Act, as amended 49 U.S.C. § 306(a) (D-
Defendant AAA Con Drivers Exchange, Inc. has its office and place of business in New…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DudgeonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Studna v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.