Legal Opinion

Kurdle v. Brookmeyer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 1937No. [No. 32, January Term, 1937.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Laverne Brookmeyer brought suit in the Baltimore City Court against Joseph Kurdle and Nan Kurdle, his wife’s parents, to recover damages allegedly sustained by him as a result of the alienation by defendants of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife, and, from a judgment obtained by him, the wife’s parents prosecute this appeal. During the course of the trial, appellants reserved three exceptions to the rulings of the trial court, the first two of which relate to admissibility of testimony, while the third concerns the prayers.

Much of the testimony is undisputed. Brookmeyer and Mary Kathryn…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Marshall v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Wolf v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  4. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. CanolesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Nicholson v. BlanchetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Marlow v. CerinoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Bank v. BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  5. BANK v. BANKCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API