Legal Opinion

Marlow v. Cerino

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 4, 1974No. 270, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Lucille Marlow, (Mrs. Marlow), one of the appellants, is a tragic person. She is currently a patient in the Baltimore Ci ty Hospital because she is cortically blind and totally and permanently incompetent. Through her guardian Mrs. Miarlow filed a suit against Dr. Cenap S. Dorkan (Dr. D>orkan), Dr. Michele Cerino (Dr. Cerino) and South Baltimore General Hospital (S.B.G.H.) in which she alleged that her current condition is a direct result of the negligence of Dr. Dorkan, Dr. Cerino and S.B.G.H. individually or any combination thereof. Mrs. Marlow’s husband joined in the suit in order to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Thomas v. CorsoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. State v. HousekeeperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Stager v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Virginia Christine Waffen v. The United States of America, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API