Fleming v. United States
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these actions under the Federal Tort Claims Act contend that a federal agency failed to adequately inspect an underground coal mine and enforce federal mine safety laws, leading to a disastrous mine explosion. The government has moved to dismiss on the grounds that the acts complained of were matters of governmental discretion over which the court has no jurisdiction and because the plaintiffs’ suit papers do not adequately set forth a cause of action under Virginia law. After considering the arguments of the parties, however, I find…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boles v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Napper v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2019
- Napper v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2019