Legal Opinion

State v. Callahan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 1997No. 20426-6-IIPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

This case requires us to decide whether a defendant who intentionally displayed a gun, but claimed that it fired accidentally, is entitled to a self- defense instruction. We hold that a self-defense instruction is appropriate where there is evidence that the defendant had a reasonable fear of the victim, intentionally pointed the gun at the victim, used a reasonable amount of force, and was not the aggressor. Because the trial court refused to instruct on self-defense, we reverse.

FACTS

On an evening in late January 1995, Shawn Michael Callahan was driving to work at the local Weyerhaeuser…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. EastmondWashington Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BrightmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Johnny Lee Riley, Jr. v. Alice PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Evans v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API