Legal Opinion

State v. Eastmond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. 63252-9PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— Defendant challenges for the first time on appeal a jury instruction’s statement of the elements of second degree assault. Reconfirming our decision in State v. Byrd, 125 Wn.2d 707, 712, 887 P.2d 396 (1995), we hold the trial court’s failure to provide a specific intent instruction constituted reversible error. We write particularly to clarify the two-step inquiry performed by an appellate court when considering a jury instruction error first raised on appeal.

This case arises from the conviction of Defendant Rondo Eastmond for second degree assault with a deadly weapon under RCW…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API