Legal Opinion

Sorlie v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2005No. 20040250PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Glenn W. Sorlie appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order denying him further disability benefits. We conclude Sorlie’s procedural due process rights were not violated by WSI’s retroactive notice of intention to discontinue benefits and WSI’s decision to deny Sorlie further disability benefits is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On March 7, 2000, Sorlie injured his right shoulder, neck, and arm while employed as a welder with Bobcat/Inger-soll Rand (“Bobcat”) in Bismarck. WSI accepted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Elshaug v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Huwe v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fettig v. Workplace Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Houn v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API