Legal Opinion

Shields v. Villareal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 9811-07817, A108341PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment confirming their ownership of an express easement across defendant’s property and an injunction ordering defendant to remove all impediments from it and to refrain from future interference. In his answer and counterclaim, defendant argued that plaintiffs had abandoned the easement and it should therefore be extinguished. The trial judge found by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiffs had abandoned the easement, and he entered judgment as requested by defendant. On de novo review, we reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs own property immediately north…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Stonier v. KronenbergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Beers v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Johnston v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API