MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
-The City demurred for that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the City of Raleigh in that there are not sufficient allegations in the complaint to show that the City of Raleigh had any legal duty to perform any of the acts which the complaint alleges that the City failed to perform.
“On a demurrer we consider only the sufficiency of the allegations set forth in the complaint. For the purpose of the de murrer the allegations are taken to be true. A demurrer cannot be sustained to a complaint if in any portion or to any extent it presents a cause of action, or if sufficient…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Taylor v. Town of HertfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Munro v. Carolina Rubber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Asheville Sports Properties, LLC v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Kizer v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- FIRST GASTON BANK v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Jennings v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.