Kizer v. City of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment in plaintiff’s negligence action. Because we decide that the City does not enjoy governmental immunity for negligent maintenance of storm drains and pipes, we affirm.
Plaintiff filed this action against the City of Raleigh (the City) seeking damages for flooding on her property due to negligent storm drain maintenance. The City has a drainage easement across plaintiff’s property, which contains a storm drain and pipe. In April of 1989 plaintiff notified the City that the storm drain was clogged and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. SwinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Williams v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Gore v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Pulliam v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jennings v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Bell v. City of New BernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Biggers v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997